Quality, certification and peer review Perceptions and misperceptions: Attitudes to peer review
نویسنده
چکیده
All the research projects discussed here were conducted in collaboration with either one of two independent research agencies based in the UK, GfkNOP or Illuminas. This discussion will draw upon three key studies. A qualitative study composed of focus groups and teledepth interviews completed in 2003–2004 which delved into the motivations and perceptions towards peer review specifically the opinions of reviewers and editors. A second quantitative study was an online survey which was completed in 2005, and based upon over 6,000 responses (authors, researchers, editors). Thirdly, an online study of Elsevier’s own reviewers which commenced in 2007, and thus far has had over 30,000 responses. All the studies are global, and cut across a range of subjects and thus are representative of research community at large.
منابع مشابه
The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles
Background and Aim: The open peer review process, which is one of the peer-reviewed methods in journals, has been accepted in scientific forums. The aim of this study was to investigate the points of view of university faculty members about the open peer review process of journal articles. Materials and Methods: The study used a descriptive survey. The sample size was calculated using the Coch...
متن کاملPeer Review – Legal and Ethical Issues Faced by Medical Staff: The Mandate for Physician Leadership
Physicians working in hospitals face challenges when it comes to understanding and meeting the medical, legal, and ethical subjects outlined in the hospital bylaws. Hospital staff physicians and the hospital administration both aspire for high quality medical care and the assurance of patient safety. Unfortunately, when quality concerns surface, there can be reasonable differences of opinion as...
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملInvolving self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in a writing course: A cross comparison and reflection of students’ perceptions
The increasing demand for lifelong learners and reflective practitioners has re-conceptualized the connection between assessment and learning to the extent that alternative assessment methods (i.e., self-, peer and teacher-assessment, etc.) have emerged. However, their incorporation into various language skills might bring about certain consequences. Among them, the writing skill is ofte...
متن کاملThe Effect of Peer Education on Health Promotion of Iranian Adolescents: A Systematic Review
Background: Peer education is one of the most effective strategies for changing behavior in adolescents, which provides the unique learning opportunities for promote health behaviors. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effect of peer education on health promotion of Iranian adolescents. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, all interventional studies were searc...
متن کامل